#53: Dr. Mark Bailey
Dear friends,
As many of you know, economist Jeffrey Sachs, the head of the Lancet Covid-19 Commission, dropped a bombshell recently when he announced his support for the theory that the origin of SARS-CoV-2 was most likely a leak from a virology lab in Wuhan, China. His assertion follows years of speculation — within the health-freedom community, the halls of Congress and in the popular and scientific press — that such an event took place.
After making this announcement, Sachs was interviewed by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., about the circumstances and evidence for this lab-leaked virus. Kennedy is also releasing a new book that purports to lay out the evidence for this theory, and how it proves the duplicity of government officials such as Fauci, who they allege are accomplices in unleashing this plague upon the world.
Other prominent lawyers, doctors and researchers have also publicly endorsed the lab-leak hypothesis. Del Bigtree of the Highwire podcast has even claimed that it's settled fact that SARS-CoV-2 was created through so-called gain-of-function research, largely funded by Fauci-led government labs. This act, they say, is allegedly the smoking gun, the proof that Covid was and is a "plandemic" organized and funded by the elites to create the conditions to enact the World Economic Forum's The Great Reset.
While it is not my intention to denigrate the good work done by Kennedy and others in exposing the horrors of the Great Reset agenda and speaking out against restrictions on our freedoms, I strongly encourage them and anyone else to listen to today's podcast with Dr. Mark Bailey. In doing so, they will hear that a SARS-CoV-2 virus could never have been leaked from a lab because no such particle has been proven to exist. Ever. Not only that, the alleged claim that SARS-CoV-2 is a chimeric virus made from portions of HIV mixed with previously discovered coronaviruses can't possibly be true because, as you probably already know, neither HIV nor previous "coronaviruses" have themselves been shown to exist.
The most interesting question of all is not the science, as that is easy to demonstrate: No natural, chimeric, lab-created or any other type of SARS-CoV-2 has been proven to exist. The question is, why this story? The answer might have come from Sachs himself, who in a long follow-up article essentially came to the conclusion that, as a result of discovering this lab leak, whether purposeful or accidental, it is no longer possible to trust national governments or virology labs to police themselves. They have been proven to be corrupt, sloppy and untrustworthy. His solution? We must put the oversight of all virology labs and, perhaps someday, of all "science" labs under the gentle and careful guidance of the World Health Organization and related supranational bodies.
I was absolutely shocked to read this purported solution. To centralize control of scientific experimentation in the WHO, an unelected and unaccountable body that pushed the effort to vaccinate most of humanity and drove the disastrous lockdown policies worldwide, would create an even bigger monster to battle. It now feels urgent for the health-freedom community to rigorously investigate the whole story of SARS-CoV-2 in particular and virology in general. As Mark and I point out in this podcast, the health-freedom promulgators of the lab-leak theory now have two options. First, they can demonstrate how they know that HIV, the original coronavirus and SARS-CoV-2 exist, and then show how this chimeric lab-created virus was spread throughout the world. Or, they can investigate further the scientific evidence of virology's catastrophic and obvious lies.
Their response to this request will help demonstrate whether a "unity conference" as proposed by Kennedy's Children's Health Defense is a real possibility. My sincere hope is that those in the medical-freedom community have simply misunderstood the science of virology.
All the best,
Tom
Connie Mossner on
Hi thank you, I am open minded, praying for truth! What are they working on in labs?What is, could be getting people sick!?
Clearly people get sick ?
Thank you kindly
Connie
Jill Herendeen on
Nice discussion! One picky point: there’s biological reality, and then there’s legal reality. I’m guessing that attorneys Martin, Kennedy, & Renz are, perhaps understandably, concerned w/ legal reality, in which Fauci forked a lot of public monies to UNC Chapel Hill & other labs, to do gain-of-function research, & doing that broke a lot of laws. Those laws were broken, & the money is gone, regardless of whether a virus exists or it’s contagious. However, ranting about “gain of function research” is itself the sales pitch for toxic jabs, which is what Fauci et al. really want. Either way, Fauci wins. Now I’m wondering whether Fauci et al. will be able to use “the virus doesn’t exist” as a defense in court.
or even whether the patent holders—who I suspect ARE patent-holders because there’s money in it—aren’t funding these lawyers’ activities because their MSM so thoroughly confuse “gain of function research” with “contagious killer virus” which, of course, drives the narrative supporting what they really want.
geo on
What can we do about corporatism? It, being psychopathic, underlies all societal destruction. I would say stand outside of it. I feel that Dr Kaufman is doing so via his career-change. I perceive a very small number of questioning people in this vanguard. Everyone else is lost! Sorry to take more space here, but I feel this needs to be seriously acted on, and I’m seeing almost no meaningful action anywhere.
Anonymous on
Hi Lizzie, I hope you are reading this. We got your comment but I accidentally deleted it. I understand you are asking about why people get sick if there is not a virus. Dr. Cowan covers that exact topic in the following video entitled, “Now that We Know There are No Pathogenic Viruses, Why do We Get Sick”: https://www.bitchute.com/video/WSh9KOiRWGPo/. Dr. Cowan is also going to be speaking publicly about this issue at the Wise Traditions Conference in Knoxville, TN in October, so if you can make it, you can learn more in person. Here’s the link to the Conference: https://www.wisetraditions.org.
Anonymous on
Hi Ivan, Dr. Cowan talks about the Flu of 1918 in his book with Sally Fallon Morell “The Contagion Myth” which is available for purchase here: https://drtomcowan.com/products/the-contagion-myth?pos=1&psq=the%20contagion&ss=e&v=1.0&variant=36509381263513
Anonymous on
Hi Joakim, Thank you for your interest in Dr. Cowan’s work and writing in with your question. I would recommend checking out the recording of the livestream by Dr. Cowan at the link I am including and see if it answers your question, as he talks about Stefan Lanka’s paper and talks about primers: https://www.bitchute.com/video/vbUeeFgrXjfC/ If you feel your question is not answered, then please drop us a note at customersupport@drtomcowan.com. Thank you! The Customer Support team for drtomcowan.com
Chris O'Connor on
Excellent, thanks for all the enlightened content.
Anonymous on
Hi Chris, thank you for your interest and for your kind words. Yes, the paper is available for viewing and downloading on Dr. Sam Bailey’s site here: https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
Martin on
Often proof of these experiments involves doing hideous procedures to animals. Anyone willing to use these techniques should be locked up as they are obviously deranged, and incapable of contributing to hoard of human knowledge!
Chris O'Connor on
Great podcst. Is Dr. Baileys paper available on another website?
I can’t enlarge it, and would like to make a hard copy so as to read it and pass it on.
ivan alex pavlov on
i vividly remember Peter Duesberg’s book
titled INVENTING THE AIDS VIRUS (and other
materials of his…)…he basically argued that
the ‘lifestyle’ of the segment of gay culture in
SF was poisoning themselves with amyl nitrate
and other recreational drugs…and he had
already argued and shown that a retro-virus
was incapable of being cytotoxic…in other
words he presented an alternative explanation
to a viral one…
Is there an alternative theory or explanation for
the 1918 pandemic ? which at the very least
is notable for it’s apparent scale…?
geo on
Thanks for this. It was inevitable that something so stupid as the great hoax of 2020 would have to collapse. I presume that the fraud did the planned and expected amount of societal damage along the way, extending into the depopulated future. I feel that those not complying have come upon personal strength not anticipated, which is the good news. I look to you, Kaufman and Bailey for sanity daily. It helps.